[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

[Seth Mattinen]

On 4/5/13 9:46 AM, Brandon Ross wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
>> I see no reason to have a policy motivated strictly by fees to remain
>> after fee changes that may or may not negate it, and to determine that
>> it should go back through the PDP. Otherwise we're just cluttering the
>> NRPM with irrelevant policy.
>
> But the problem is that you don't know how the fee schedule might change
> in the future, and it would be nearly impossible to capture every
> possible permutation and create a rational outcome.
>


That's why I oppose fee-motivated policy in the first place.

~Seth