[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3: Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs

[Brandon Ross]

On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Seth Mattinen wrote:

> I see no reason to have a policy motivated strictly by fees to remain after 
> fee changes that may or may not negate it, and to determine that it should go 
> back through the PDP. Otherwise we're just cluttering the NRPM with 
> irrelevant policy.

But the problem is that you don't know how the fee schedule might change 
in the future, and it would be nearly impossible to capture every possible 
permutation and create a rational outcome.

-- 
Brandon Ross                                      Yahoo & AIM:  BrandonNRoss
+1-404-635-6667                                                ICQ:  2269442
Schedule a meeting:  https://doodle.com/bross            Skype:  brandonross