[arin-ppml] Regarding unauthorized changes (Re: Policy question)

[Jeffrey Lyon]

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:08 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net> wrote:
>> I can't go into a lot of detail about my specific case as there is now
>> a court filing from what I understand. My bigger goal here is to
>> compel ARIN to adopt a process similar to UDRP that would allow
>> resource holder's to enforce their rights without blowing their rainy
>> day fund on a lawyer.
>
> Jeffrey -
>
> Many parties include an arbitration clause in their contracts which
> provides for a similar mechanism (i.e. a hearing with small panel)
> for this reason, and would be worth considering in any contractual
> arrangements in which you want an alternative short of court in dealing
> with Internet number resources.  Feel free to review ARIN's RSA and
> LRSA (in section 14.k.ii) for typical language if that would be helpful:
>
>   <https://www.arin.net/resources/agreements/index.html>
>
> Thanks!
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>
>

John,

Arbitration does not compel ARIN to move resources, so the entire
issue is forced into the courts. From there, we all pay substantial
legal fees. It's a lose-lose situation.

-- 
Jeffrey A. Lyon, CISSP
President, Black Lotus Communications
mobile: (757) 304-0668 | gtalk: jeffrey.lyon at gmail.com | skype: blacklotus.net