[arin-ppml] Regarding unauthorized changes (Re: Policy question)
jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net
Thu Sep 20 10:50:23 EDT 2012
The unauthorized change preceded the failure of ARIN to assist in reverting
the errorneous record. You're protecting the wrong party.
On Sep 20, 2012 9:28 AM, "John Curran" <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Sep 19, 2012, at 5:12 PM, Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net>
> > There certainly have. We had one about a month ago on a /22 we
> > acquired in an acquisition and ARIN's official response (from their
> > legal department) was too bad, get a lawyer. So right now we're
> > wasting 5 figures to get a court order for something they could have
> > easily fixed.
> To be clear, ARIN's response is that we cannot proceed when the current POC
> for an address block denies the transfer request, but we would follow any
> legal order you obtain to clarify the situation (i.e. the adjudication of
> contractual documents in contested circumstances is best done by judges.)
> Maintaining the status quo in such circumstances is actually a protection
> against unauthorized changes.
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-PPML