[arin-ppml] quantitative study of IPv4 address market

Steven Ryerse SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com
Tue Sep 4 13:05:54 EDT 2012


For all of the reasons I've stated in the past I believe it is harmful.  I agree with Owen here.  

Steven L Ryerse
President
100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338
770.656.1460 - Cell
770.399.9099 - Office
770.392-0076 - Fax

℠ Eclipse Networks, Inc.
                     Conquering Complex Networks℠


-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 6:01 PM
To: Milton L Mueller
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] quantitative study of IPv4 address market

The goal of ARIN address policy is to place addresses in service where they are needed so long as that is possible.

This is the overarching goal of both the allocation policy _AND_ the transfer policy.

Keeping addresses in inventory when they are needed in implementations is every bit as counterproductive to that goal as would be eliminating the justified need requirement from allocation or transfer policy.

If policy is prematurely driving people to the transfer market because of the huge discrepancy in terms we have created with recent policy changes, then, it is evidence that that discrepancy is harmful.

Owen

On Aug 31, 2012, at 14:17 , Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:

> It's kind of a catch-22. If you lengthen the time horizon for ARIN numbers, they will go out the door faster. 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com]
>> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 5:09 PM
>> To: Milton L Mueller
>> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] quantitative study of IPv4 address market
>> 
>> Assuming the numbers are accurate, this, above all else, proves that 
>> we probably should reconsider the 3-month policy and/or redistribute 
>> part of the ARIN free pool to other registries.
>> 
>> Owen
>> 
>> On Aug 31, 2012, at 13:50 , Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> This report is probably of interest to this list:
>>> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/08/31/the-first-study-of-the-
>>> em
>>> erging-market-for-ipv4-numbers/
>>> 
>>> Milton L. Mueller
>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies 
>>> Internet Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PPML
>>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the 
>>> ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

_______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list