[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-182 Update Residential Customer Definition to not exclude wireless as Residential Service

[Chris Grundemann]

On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.list6 at gmail.com> wrote:

> The point i am trying to make is that there is not a meaningful
> difference from IP address policy or technology architectures.  So, my
> proposal tries to make that clear.
>
> Why does it matter if i consume the service / use the IP address at my
> home or in a park 5 kilometers away?

What about a park on the other side of the city, state, or country?

Speaking neither for or against the policy change; mobility is
absolutely a different animal when it comes to address allocation
within your network - I.e. counting homes under a given cell site is
not nearly (if at all) relevant as counting homes served by a fixed
service PoP (CO/Headend/AP/etc.).  Mobile addresses get used where
people are, fixed residential addresses get used where homes are. This
does not mean that the policy is perfect, it just means that the issue
is not quite as black and white as you paint it - there *are*
meaningful differences that *do* need to be considered.

$0.02
~Chris

>
> CB
>


-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
http://chrisgrundemann.com