[arin-ppml] Encouraging IPv6 Transition (was: Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement)

[William Herrin]

On 5/14/12, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 9:16 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>> On 5/14/12, Chris Grundemann <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> (both of these ideas likely need to move to ARIN discuss if they are
>>> of interest and probably should go into the ASCP process if there is
>>> support for either/both at this time)
>>
>> It makes exactly no sense to discuss ideas for end-user assignments on
>> a CLOSED discussion list to which very few end user assignees have
>> access. Not if you want public access and public participation anyway.
>
> The ideas are simply not policy based. This being a policy mailing
> list I thought it best to point that out, and facilitate a move to the
> more appropriate list (which is open to all ARIN members, and to
> discussions of fees).

Hi Chris,

ARIN members = ISPs plus a couple score other random folks. Is it your
belief that it is "more appropriate" for only these individuals to
engage in this discussion or offer input to the matter?

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004