[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-169 Cleanup IPv6 section 6.5.7
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Thu May 3 02:07:00 EDT 2012
I support this proposal as well.
I am the author of 2011-3 and to my recollection, failing to remove this language was purely an oversight.
Owen
On May 2, 2012, at 12:56 PM, David Farmer wrote:
> I support this proposal, and I believe it would simplify the text of 6.5.7.
>
> As one of the shepherds for ARIN-2011-3, I'd like to provide some context;
>
> ARIN-2011-3 originally had requirement for return that was removed in the last-call process. With a return requirement it made sense to keep the original text allowing /35 recipients to move to /32 without return. I honestly don't recall if it was simply an oversight that we didn't change the text to replace 6.5.7 or if we did it that way to minimize the changes made in last call. However, the modified ARIN-2011-3 called for the text to be added to the section and not replace the section, so to be clear ARIN Staff implemented ARIN-2011-3 as instructed by the policy.
>
> Thanks Andrew.
>
> On 5/2/12 14:00 CDT, ARIN wrote:
>
>> ARIN-prop-169 Cleanup IPv6 section 6.5.7
>>
>> Proposal Originator: Andrew Dul
>>
>> Proposal Version: 1
>>
>> Date: 2 May 2012
>>
>> Proposal type: modify
>>
>> Policy term: permanent
>>
>> Policy statement:
>>
>> Remove paragraph starting with "Organizations that received /35 IPv6
>> allocations under the previous" in section 6.5.7 of NRPM.
>>
>> Rationale:
>>
>> Problem Statement: Cleanup existing NRPM policy to make IPv6 policy
>> clearer and more concise.
>>
>> Section 6.5.7 was modified by policy 2011-3 by adding the paragraph
>>
>> "LIRs which received an allocation under previous policies which is
>> smaller than what they are entitled to under this policy may receive a
>> new initial allocation under this policy. If possible, ARIN will expand
>> their existing allocation."
>>
>> to this section.
>>
>> The new paragraph that was added is believed to be inclusive of the
>> original paragraph's intent, thus making the current 1st paragraph of
>> this section redundant.
>>
>> The second paragraph is believed to be inclusive of allocations that
>> would be granted under the first paragraph.
>>
>> Timetable for implementation: As soon as practical
>
> --
> ===============================================
> David Farmer Email:farmer at umn.edu
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952
> ===============================================
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list