[arin-ppml] Clarify /29 assignment identification requirement

[Dmitry Burkov]

 John,
first of all - I speak just in personal


I worry not about CALEA reqs - which is your (US job - hope you remember it is not for  all your region) - we have
compareablae - named SORM.

It is not about it - the issue for me - should be RIR  responsible for end user assignments data?

Dima
PS
IMHO  it could be the biggist mistake in our policies or actions


sorry - i am on vacations and can't reply in time


On Apr 30, 2012, at 9:04 PM, John Curran wrote:

> On Apr 30, 2012, at 12:37 PM, "Dmitry Burkov" <dburk at burkov.aha.ru> wrote:
>> It can be a big mistake even in such polite manner to interpret badly (flexible) defined policies to satisfy
>> local LEAs expectations. It can be dangerous precedent  for all RIRs.
> 
> Dmitri -
> 
>   ARIN does not have any expectations  to meet except those set by the community via policy.  Law enforcement has a voice in the process just as anyone in the public discussion.
> Verification of utilization orginates from the need to maintain appropriate stewardship, not any requirement from government or LEA.
> 
>> May be I mistaken- but in result of all discussions of last years - for me it seems that you (ARIN) are possible under the more pressure of some guys and sometimes it is hard to ignore all their requests - what I can understand.
> 
> ARIN doesn't experience any particular pressures in this area; we simply direct any desires for new policy to the community policy development process.
> 
>> I saw also  that community splitted in their views - but it seems there are no still reason to concentrate data (PII) in one place.
> 
> Full agreement; the detailed data that we request should be retained no longer than necessary, and I have taken an action item to review how we go about retaining such information for an appropriate period.
> 
> Thanks!
> /John
> 
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
>