[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-176 Increase Needs-Based Justification to 60months on 8.3 Specified Transfers (Owen DeLong)

[Morizot Timothy S]

I agree with the below. I would support the idea of making free pool allocations (after slow start) equal to the 24 month period for transfers until we reach the last /8 in the free pool. I don't support any upward changes to the needs requirement in the market portion of policy.

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of John Springer
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 4:28 PM
To: sandrabrown at ipv4marketgroup.com
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-176 Increase Needs-Based Justification to 60months on 8.3 Specified Transfers (Owen DeLong)

I am top posting my response to this kind of over the top diatribe because I tried to go through and respond to all the items that I disagree with but found, in the end, just simpler to say that I disagree with _ALL_ of it except this statement: "Today many legacy address holders do not have contracts with ARIN."

I oppose ARIN-prop-176 as written. I like Mr. Sinatra's idea of working toward a 36 month justification period over the next N period. I am in favor of discussing this in Dallas.

John Springer