[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-161 and 162

[Joe Maimon]

David Farmer wrote:

> However, I have a question for the community, do you want to discuss
> only a draft policy based on ARIN-prop-162 in Vancouver or would you
> also like to discuss a draft policy based on ARIN-prop-161 also?
>

Personally I would like to see them both abandoned, with the reasoning 
congruent to that quoted for many other abandonments of post ipv4 runout 
policies.

Joe