[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-161 and 162

David Farmer farmer at umn.edu
Fri Jan 27 11:43:12 EST 2012


With twenty-twenty hide-sight it was premature to trigger the change to 
3 months at IANA run-out, we ended up with way more addresses than 
anyone realistically expected.  I think resetting the trigger to an 
equivalent of a /8 in the free pool, excluding the special reservations 
we've made, is appropriate.

However, I have a question for the community, do you want to discuss 
only a draft policy based on ARIN-prop-162 in Vancouver or would you 
also like to discuss a draft policy based on ARIN-prop-161 also?

Personally, I would be incline to only move a draft policy based on 
ARIN-prop-162 forward for adoption discussion in Vancouver.  Although, I 
see no harm in also moving a version of ARIN-prop-161 forward for 
discussion if there is interest in the community to discuss it as well.

On 1/27/12 09:53 CST, Mike Burns wrote:
> Support, three months is too short given the size of our pool.
>
>
> -----Original Message----- From: ARIN Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012
> 9:59 AM To: arin-ppml at arin.net Subject: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-162
> Redefining request window in 4.2.4.4
> ARIN-prop-162 Redefining request window in 4.2.4.4
>
> ARIN received the following policy proposal and is posting it to the
> Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) in accordance with the Policy
> Development Process.
>
> The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review the proposal at their next
> regularly scheduled meeting (if the period before the next regularly
> scheduled meeting is less than 10 days, then the period may be extended
> to the subsequent regularly scheduled meeting). The AC will decide how
> to utilize the proposal and announce the decision to the PPML.
>
> The AC invites everyone to comment on the proposal on the PPML,
> particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning
> behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough
> vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations.
>
> Draft Policies and Proposals under discussion can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html
>
> The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
> https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html
>
> Mailing list subscription information can be found
> at: https://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/
>
> Regards,
>
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> ## * ##
>
>
> ARIN-prop-162 Redefining request window in 4.2.4.4
>
> Proposal Originator: Martin Hannigan
>
> Proposal Version: 1.0
>
> Date: 27 JAN 2012
>
> Proposal type: MODIFY
>
> Policy term: PERMANENT
>
> Policy statement:
>
> NRPM Section 4.2.4.4. Subscriber Members After One Year
>
> Change the following text from:
>
> When ARIN receives its last /8, by IANA implementing section 10.4.2.2,
> the length of supply that an organization may request will be reduced.
> An organization may choose to request up to a 3-month supply of IP
> addresses.
>
> To:
>
> When the ARIN free pool is down to one allocation away from the last /8,
> the length of supply that an organization may request will be reduced.
> An organization may choose to request up to three month supply of IP
> addresses.
>
> Rationale:
>
> There has been discussion in the community that the excess inventory
> in the ARIN region is damaging the transition to v6 by elongating the
> amount of time between internal exhaustion and exhaustion by other
> RIR's and allowing all to proceed in a manner which can be described
> as "business as usual". ARIN's stewardship responsibilities are of
> primary concern in this region. Asking businesses to request addresses
> on a three month basis with such large inventory available at ARIN
> unnecessarily increases the cost and complexity of operating the
> network; repeated and slow interactions with ARIN, duplicate paperwork
> requirements and an inefficient use of resources by all compound the
> pain.
>
> Considering that ARIN has roughly 6 /8's available, restating the need
> window to one year and basing an austerity measure on a local
> condition now that we have experience seems prudent and in the
> interest of all.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-- 
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota	
2218 University Ave SE	    Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list