[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-165 Eliminate Needs-Based Justification on 8.3 Specified Transfers
owen at delong.com
Fri Feb 17 14:12:50 EST 2012
This wouldn't test the bigger concerns about a market.
The larger concerns come from market manipulation, speculative trading, and efforts to control/corner the market. There would be no incentive to do so in the test market.
On Feb 17, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Gene Jeffers
> <gene.jeffers at emp.shentel.com> wrote:
>> Put me down as opposed to this measure. It definitely opens the door to
>> speculation and “hoarding” of address space by companies that can afford to
>> buy it up. I have no problem with existing “need based” regulations.
>> Gene Jeffers
>> Network Engineer
>> Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
> I would be interested in seeing a small allocation carved out for the
> purpose of running a test, to see what would happen in a free market
> without needs basis. Those who have justified need could continue
> using existing policies to obtain space, and those without (eg. need
> space in a pinch, cant/dont feel like writing up justification) could
> purchase from the special allocation at the going market rate.
> Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
> jeffrey.lyon at blacklotus.net | http://www.blacklotus.net
> Black Lotus Communications - AS32421
> First and Leading in DDoS Protection Solutions
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-PPML