[arin-ppml] /32 assignment identification requirement

[Lee Dilkie]

On 4/27/2012 12:26 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 4/27/2012 11:05 AM, David Krumme wrote:
>> First, I don't know what a "readonly meeting session" is and I wouldn't
>> know how to set one up.  I guess that's problem #1.
>
> Similar to what router vendors request. You join a session (usually a
> java app loaded from a webpage) and share out your ssh window so that
> they can watch what you are doing. Generally a vendor can type
> themselves, but it's possible to have it readonly (vendor just watches).
>
> While it is possible that the rep could screen capture, the
> information you'd show would be less than what they normally ask to be
> emailed to them. As it currently stands, a lot of information is just
> sent via email and stored in the ticketing system.
>
>
> Jack
> _______________________________________________
>

It seems to me, and I am not a lawyer, that even requesting third party
customer information, much less storing it is just a ticking time
bomb... waiting for the day ARIN gets either hacked or a
disgruntled/wikileaks employee posts the information either publically
or sells it.

-lee

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20120427/6479bda3/attachment.htm>