[arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2011-1: ARIN Inter-RIR Transfers- revised

[Owen DeLong]

For addresses in the ARIN free pool, I would agree with you.

For addresses already allocated to organizations that could seek transfer recipients
under 8.3 for whatever reason, the question is whether to limit those transfers to
transfer within the ARIN region or allow them to extend to organizations that need
resources outside of the ARIN region.

I believe that so long as the other RIR maintains a needs-basis requirement for
transfer recipients, such transfers should be permitted.

Owen

On Sep 22, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Kevin Kargel wrote:

> 
> 
>  
> ________________________________________
>> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On >Behalf Of Bill Darte
>> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:08 PM
>> To: Jeffrey Lyon; Scott Leibrand
>> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
>> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2011-1: ARIN Inter-RIR >Transfers- revised
>> 
>> Those addresses were originally received from IANA...why would they not be >returned to the originator?
>> 
>> bd
> 
> That is exactly where they should go.  If we can define addresses as surplus and declare that we do not need them and we will not need them in the future then we should responsibly return them to IANA from whence we they came. 
> 
> There should be *NO* inter-RIR transfers that do not involve the auspices of IANA.  
> 
> Has anyone queried IANA to see what they think of the issue?
> 
> Kevin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.