[arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-1: ARIN Inter-RIR Transfers - Last Call

[CJ Aronson]

I agree with David.. all policies get integrated into NRPM.   One of the
comments we got in Philly is that the text being discussed was not written
in a way that it fit into the NRPM.

The AC moved this text to last call.  According to the PDP this is within
our purview to do so.  So let's talk about this text and what folks
like/don't like about it.

If you want to propose changes to the PDP we can start another discussion
about that.. Note that there is a new PDP out right now to the community for
comments.

Thanks
----Cathy

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:12 PM, David Farmer <farmer at umn.edu> wrote:

>
> On 10/19/11 19:28 CDT, William Herrin wrote:
> .....
>
>  If a draft can, among other things, switch from adding text for a new
>> situation to the NRPM to rewriting and changing the meaning of
>> existing text in the NRPM then what's the point of having a PDP
>> section 2 and 3 at all? Let's just discuss ideas and then start all
>> the drafts at last call.
>>
>
> There has never been anything explicitly stated about this being a separate
> section of the NRPM,  Almost all of the discussion I find is in a context of
> 8.3 transfers, there was one mention of including IPv6, but it didn't get
> much traction that I see.  Further, there was a fairly long thread in May
> with the subject "Integrating Draft Policy ARIN-2011-1 into NRPM 8.3" and
> back at San Juan Bill's slides had much the same context.
>
> https://www.arin.net/**participate/meetings/reports/**
> ARIN_XXVII/PDF/Monday/darte_**prop2011_1.pdf<https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_XXVII/PDF/Monday/darte_prop2011_1.pdf>
>
> The idea that this would not be integrated into 8.3 in one way or another
> is not supported by what I could find in the discussion anywhere.
>
> I'll admit, we are making non-trivial changes to the text, we said that,
> that is why we did an Extended Last-Call.  But I believe it is what the
> community was asking us to do.
>
> Finally, if the consensus of the community in last-call is to take it back
> to another PPM, I'm fine with that too.  However, that is not the sense of
> the room I took out of Philly.
>
> I would really appreciate a clear consensus from the community on this one.
>  What do you want us to do?  Please comment, even if it is simply you
> support or not the text as written.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --
> ==============================**=================
> David Farmer               Email:farmer at umn.edu
> Networking & Telecommunication Services
> Office of Information Technology
> University of Minnesota
> 2218 University Ave SE      Phone: 612-626-0815
> Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
> ==============================**=================
> ______________________________**_________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/**listinfo/arin-ppml<http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml>
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20111019/95c5969e/attachment.htm>