[arin-ppml] Downstreams, needs less than /24 and PI availability

[Kevin Kargel]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 1:22 PM
> To: Martin Hannigan
> Cc: Kevin Kargel; arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Downstreams, needs less than /24 and PI
> availability
> 
> 
> On Oct 7, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Kevin Kargel <kkargel at polartel.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > [ snip ]
> >
> >>>
> >>> How should a network meet their utilization requirements and how
> >>> should ARIN foster aggregation per "RFC 2050" and "ICP-2" then? If I
> >>> have to use a /24 for a miniscule amount of addressing needs what's my
> >>> relief valve in policy then? GTL?
> >
> >> [kjk] The network should apply to their provider for PA space.  If the
> >> provider won't give it to them they should get a new provider.
> >
> > Really? What if all providers do this?
> 
> An unlikely scenario at best.
> 
> Making policy based on FUD is rarely useful and almost always contrary
> to the good of the community.
> 
> Owen
[kjk] Owen always cuts to the heart of the matter and says thing more
efficiently than I.  Thanks Owen.
[/kjk]

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4935 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20111007/67683e13/attachment.bin>