[arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-1: ARIN Inter-RIR Transfers - Revised Assessment

[Bill Darte]

John,

You say there is 'clear opposition' and only 'limited support'.
I would say there is 'very vocal opposition' from a few folks and
limited support and opposition from the remainder.

bd

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net 
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of John Curran
> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 8:35 PM
> To: Jimmy Hess
> Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net (arin-ppml at arin.net)
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-1: ARIN Inter-RIR 
> Transfers - Revised Assessment
> 
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 9:17 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> 
> > Well,  if there were 124 people present and only  24 weighted in...
> > that's what 20% stepping in to say they're
> > in favor of doing that, and  14%   of those present  
> stepping in as opposed ?
> > 
> > That's not a majority either way, then.   A majority would be 62
> > stepping in to say they're in favor, right?
> > And less than one third of those present made a show of support or 
> > oppose either way?
> > It sounds like the great majority didn't want to weigh in,  
> either direction.
> 
> Jimmy - 
> 
>   Since the room often has a wide range of folks (many of whom do not
>   show support either way, such as ARIN staff or visiting staff of the
>   other RIRs, AC or Board members under most conditions, 
> invited guests),
>   the total count in the room is always somewhat greater than 
> the count
>   of active participants. 
> 
> > Which sounds like both massive lack of support of 2011-1 actually 
> > moving to last call, and massive lack of particular opposition as 
> > well.
> > 
> > So you had a moderate show of support from the community of the 
> > concept of providing for interregional transfers with 42% showing in
> > favor  and <1% showing as opposed,    but quite limited show of full
> > support for the text proposed   or of moving to last call.
> 
>   Actually, I agree with your comparison in any case: the concept of
>   providing for interregional transfers in some form had 
> moderate support
>   (I'd actually consider it "strong" in light of the count 
> issues above)
>   whereas advancing the presented policy language (with 
> corrections) to
>   last call had limited support and clear opposition in the community.
> 
> FYI,
> /John
> 
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to 
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>