[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-148 LRSA resources must not betransferred to LRSA

[Mike Burns]

+1 to the idea of publishing redacted RSAs.
-Mike


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com>
To: "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us>
Cc: "John Curran" <jcurran at arin.net>; <arin-ppml at arin.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-148 LRSA resources must not betransferred 
to LRSA


>
> On May 11, 2011, at 5:46 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:03 PM, Jimmy Hess <mysidia at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:29 PM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>>>> This allows for John Curran's case where the RSA sees minor changes to
>>>> accommodate government entities and the like.
>>>> -Bill
>>>
>>> If ARIN staff feels there are minor changes they should make to the
>>> RSA, they should
>>> make public record of those changes somewhere,  and explain when they
>>> are used,
>>
>> I agree. John -- how about publishing the one-off modified RSAs and
>> LRSAs that have been used and explaining in each case what change was
>> made and why it was deemed appropriate? Making non-substantive
>> adjustments doesn't inherently strike me as unreasonable, but the
>> interests of transparency would be well served by making those
>> adjustments public knowledge.
>>
> Agreed. This should be possible without identifying the particular
> recipient of the modification, so, I don't believe it would violate
> any NDA to do so.
>
> Owen
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.