[arin-ppml] transfer conditions

[Owen DeLong]

On May 9, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:

> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
>> On May 9, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
> 
>> Note that even the "normal RSA" gets modified for certain entities, and the LRSA is also often "customized"
>> 
> In what way does the RSA get "modified" for certain entities?
> Do we have examples?
> 
Some examples that have been cited in the past include modification removing
indemnity clauses from RSAs issued to certain government bodies or government
run institutions which have legal prohibitions that would prevent them from signing
such a contract.

> I would suggest at least the requirement that the RSA used
> match a RSA published in the "Agreements" section of ARIN's website.
> 
Modulo reasonable accommodations to local governing law or specific laws
applicable to the institution in question such as shown above, I agree.

> Some organizations getting private RSAs of their choosing would be inconsistent
> with ARIN treating all organizations that receive service impartially.
> 
I don't believe that is what is happening.

> 'Special' organizations should not have have rights, waiver of
> community developed
> policies, or other privileges granted to them by ARIN, not afforded to others,
> just because they are X, and  "X is special".
> 
I believe John Curran has stated that all such modifications have not been to these
core issues, but, rather revolve around satisfying certain government mandates.

Owen