[arin-ppml] Statistics regarding NRPM 8.3 Transfers to date

Kevin Kargel kkargel at polartel.com
Tue May 3 10:49:17 EDT 2011


________________________________
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 6:34 PM
To: Stephen Sprunk
Cc: arin-ppml at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Statistics regarding NRPM 8.3 Transfers to date


On May 2, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:


On 02-May-11 15:41, Owen DeLong wrote:

On May 1, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 01-May-11 11:05, Owen DeLong wrote:

While I would be fine with ARIN fulfilling your request with 2 /24s that were already disjoint, however, I don't want to see someone with, say, 44/8 find a buyer that needs a /20 and sell them 44.0.5/24, 44.0.8/24, 44.15.23/24, 44.28.6/24, etc.

How about this:

"The transferor's resources may be recursively bisected the minimum number of times necessary to create one CIDR block equal to the transferee's justified need."

So, if someone with a /8 wants to sell you a /20, their /8 would be divided into one /9, one /10, one /11, one /12, one /13, one /14, one /15, one /16, one /17, one /18, one /19 and two /20s, and then you would get one of those /20s.

Would it perhaps be simpler to say that transfers of sub-blocks (partial transfers?) must be done on CIDR boundaries from the edge (extremity?) of the donor block ?

Kevin

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20110503/732664bd/attachment.html>


More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list