[arin-ppml] Analogies

[John Curran]

On May 3, 2011, at 2:07 AM, William Herrin wrote:

> Maybe you mean 10b which is the only obvious thing that sets out a
> condition that could be inconsistent with the NRPM. It says, "ARIN
> will take no action to reduce the services provided for Included
> Number Resources that are not currently being utilized by the Legacy
> Applicant." And it doesn't even promise to leave all the registrant's
> addresses intact... just the ones that "are not currently being
> utilized."

Bill - 
 
   I'm currently looking into this precise phrase, as it appears
   to combine two concepts incorrectly.  I'll report back shortly.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN