[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-127: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension

[Jack Bates]

On 1/22/2011 1:20 PM, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
>> or the policy must MANDATE that all NAT444 justifications
>> >  must utilize the /10
> I'm not sure if CGN deployment is justification for a request.  Can someone
> in the know comment on that?
>
> Even if it is justification, that restriction might be considered
> overreaching by the community.
I don't consider it to be overreaching. If we mandated CGN deployments, 
that would be overreaching. However, I'm not suggesting that we state 
you must utilize CGN and the /10. I'm suggesting that we mandate use of 
the /10 when you have deployed CGN for justifications purposes.


Jack