[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-127: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension
jbates at brightok.net
Sat Jan 22 14:59:05 EST 2011
On 1/22/2011 1:20 PM, Frank Bulk - iName.com wrote:
>> or the policy must MANDATE that all NAT444 justifications
>> > must utilize the /10
> I'm not sure if CGN deployment is justification for a request. Can someone
> in the know comment on that?
> Even if it is justification, that restriction might be considered
> overreaching by the community.
I don't consider it to be overreaching. If we mandated CGN deployments,
that would be overreaching. However, I'm not suggesting that we state
you must utilize CGN and the /10. I'm suggesting that we mandate use of
the /10 when you have deployed CGN for justifications purposes.
More information about the ARIN-PPML