[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-127: Shared Transition Space for IPv4 Address Extension

[Owen DeLong]

Let's face it... We've spent decades looking for the killer app. to encourage IPv6
migration.

NAT444 is that killer app.

Owen

On Jan 21, 2011, at 1:49 PM, Chris Donley wrote:

> 
> Still, my major source of discomfort is enabling v4 forever.
> [CD] I think the market will take care of that.  NAT444 is going to suck for all but the most basic services.  It will offer a degraded quality of experience for video streaming, gaming, voice, etc. - services customers want to use.  IPv6 will offer a better quality of experience through bypassing the NAT.  Customers will get the message and start using IPv6 as they replace legacy devices. As Owen said, NAT444 is a great business case for IPv6. I don't see any way around NAT444, though.  It's the only IPv4 extension technology that's readily deployable and doesn't require a new home gateway.   
> 
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.