[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-130: IPv4 Transition Reservation for Every ASN

[Chris Grundemann]

What about new organizations formed between IPv4 depletion and IPv6
parity? Don't they also need a /24 to get started, even if they focus
on IPv6 connectivity.

Once you consider them, this might start to look like APNIC's last /8
policy, where the whole thing is reserved and everybody (new and
existing) gets a single dip...

~Chris

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 14:12, Matthew Kaufman <matthew at matthew.at> wrote:
>
> The NRPM 4.10 block will be rapidly consumed by the organizations that move
> first. This leaves every other organization without a means for acquiring
> transition addresses. Proposal 130 is specifically about addressing *every
> other organization*.
>
> There is no danger of "creating a large pool of space reserved for ASNs that
> will not likely ever use it" because, if IPv6 transition is successful,
> there will be a huge surplus of IPv4 space and these reservations will just
> be a drop in the bucket at that point.
>
> I would support putting a deadline by which the space must be claimed, but I
> fear that any reasonable deadline would be after the point where it doesn't
> matter.
>
> Matthew Kaufman
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>




-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.net
www.coisoc.org