[arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-128: Replacement of Section 4.2.4.4

[Chris Grundemann]

Hi Gary,

Thanks for the comments, I would like to clarify a couple things
though; comments in-line below.

Cheers,
~Chris


On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 14:26, Gary Buhrmaster
<gary.buhrmaster at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ARIN-prop-128: Replacement of Section 4.2.4.4
>
> Opposed.
>
> Reasons include:
>
> * It is an IPv4 policy.  Deck chairs.  Titanic.

If you are still relying on IPv4 (to receive this message for
example), it is possible that IPv4 policy still has some relevance to
you.

> * Length of membership does not define needs.
>  One's time in the club should not mean your
>  needs are more important then others.

Point of clarity here; the one year term is existing policy, not a
change: https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four244

> * I really do not think this is a better policy than
>  the existing one.

Fair enough.

> * I think I remember a post (from John Curran?), where it
>  was stated that there is (almost) an agreement regarding
>  legacy space between the RIRs.  I would certainly like
>  to know more about that before trying to throw it into a
>  new policy.

There is a global policy that would facilitate the return of legacy
space from ARIN to the IANA but it is moving slow (as global policies
do). More importantly, ARIN-prop-128 does not preclude ARIN returning
space to IANA, it simply states that if they do not return it, it must
be counted.

>
> Gary
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>




-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.net
www.coisoc.org