[arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
kkargel at polartel.com
Fri Jan 7 11:09:18 EST 2011
I still oppose p125 . ARIN is still a registrar and still has no business specifying network topology or operation. I am not saying that the intent of p125 is necessarily evil, but that ARIN is not the appropriate venue to accomplish the goals.
Forced IPv6 adoption should be handled by one of the protocol standards organizations (if it should happen at all), not by the numbering registrar.
IPv6 will be a natural mutation. As content becomes available end users will demand IPv6 and that will drive adoption. IPv6 is bigger than ARIN.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On
> Behalf Of Chris Grundemann
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 7:59 PM
> To: arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient
> Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
> In response to feedback both on and off list, the other originators of
> this policy and I have agreed on a much lighter weight version of
> prop-125. Although I can not revise the proposal while it is under
> petition, I would like to share the new text with everyone and ask for
> your support. If the petition is successful, I will submit this new
> text as version 2.
> Changes in this version:
> 1) Added parallel IPv6 networks in addition to dual-stack.
> 2) Removed the explicit application to transfers.
> 3) Removed all retro-active requirements.
More information about the ARIN-PPML