[arin-ppml] FW: Proposal: Clarification of draft policy 2009-3 (ARIN-prop-135)
jcurran at arin.net
Sat Feb 19 21:02:19 EST 2011
Correct. Make the intent of the policy clear and unambiguous. I believe the AC is working on that presently.
On Feb 20, 2011, at 9:52 AM, "William Herrin" <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:18 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>> On Feb 20, 2011, at 9:11 AM, William Herrin wrote:
>>> So I'm still UNCLEAR what conflict arises if local policies and
>>> strategies designate -nothing- for return.
>> If local policies specifically designate that nothing should
>> be returned under any circumstance, there is no confusion.
>> Given that the language is policies and strategies, and the
>> existing practice is to return space to the IANA, a policy
>> proposal which is not explicit in this area is indeed unclear.
> Then to clarify the staff guidance, staff would like prop 131 to
> indicate whether or not it intends to specify what addresses should be
> returned to IANA under pending global policy 2009-3 (yes) and if so,
> what addresses those are (none). This has nothing to do with
> preempting or not preempting global policy, something an ARIN-local
> policy like 131 can't do anyway.
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML