[arin-ppml] inevitability of NAT?

[Jerry Bacon]

On 2/10/2011 9:47 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> This makes a huge difference in the way applications currently operate and means that porting to IPv6 is, in most cases, simpler than incorporating sufficient workarounds to cope with LSN/CGN.

This seems like the best reason that I have heard in favor of deploying 
LSN/CGN. Maybe it will actually push the demand for IPv6 to the point 
where it becomes essential and more cost effective.

-- 
Jerry Bacon
Senior Network Engineer