[arin-ppml] Use of the specified transfer policy (was: "Leasing" of space via non-connectivity providers)

Martin Hannigan hannigan at gmail.com
Tue Feb 8 14:41:43 EST 2011

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 2:27 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>> I think you have it backwards, Bill. Commissions are orthogonal, the
>> LRSA is a roadblock.
> Martin -
> The LRSA may be a roadblock depending on your particular goal. From
> your prior message, you propose three major areas for change:
>  A. Need for a "mutual termination"/"walk away" option
>  B. Need to be obligated to comply only with WHOIS-related policies
>  B. Need for favorable fees and inclusion of ARIN membership
>  (My summary, apologizes if I missed anything major...)

This looks good.

> With respect to "B", are you proposing that the currently adopted
> transfer policies not apply to legacy holders who enter an LRSA,
> or only that the policy set (other than for WHOIS policies) not
> change for them once they have entered into agreement?

That's a good question.



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list