[arin-ppml] Borders sells their /16 block

[Paul Vixie]

On 12/8/2011 3:51 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
> ...
> But I've not had much luck with, for instance, a policy proposal to
> allow a legacy holder seller and their recipient to work out an
> arbitrary "more liberal" justification of need than is currently
> specified. And even if I did, it wouldn't pass soon enough for
> Borders/Cerner to take advantage of it.

matthew, i don't think a policy proposal along those lines would reach
consensus. but let's have a thought experiment and find out. what's your
value proposition here -- why would it be beneficial to the community to
have more liberal needs justifications for transfers?