[arin-ppml] Borders sells their /16 block

[Martin Hannigan]

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:01 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2011, at 3:14 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
>> Why don't we just go back to the court documents and reference where
>> each have said 'while we don't necessarily need to deal with ARIN'
>
> Incorrect.
>
> In Nortel, the actual court document was approved only with affirmation
> that the recipient had entered into a registration services agreement
> with ARIN.  See prior posting to Mike for the specific references.

John,

I encourage you to provide a cite to a specific line in the document
that affirms your statement. We can agree to disagree for now.

>
> In Kremen, the Court cited as fact in its Order ARIN's representations:
>

[ clip ]

In Kremens, I was also talking about where ARIN disclaimed authority
over legacy addresses. YMMV.

Best,

-M<