[arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-2 (Was: Forcing POCs and other contacts to act through a "blacklist")

[John Curran]

On Apr 29, 2011, at 11:43 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:

> I also have trouble squaring statements like:
> 
>  "We currently do pursue misuse of resources for reclamation. But a
>   directive from the community saying expend a significant focused effort
>   in this area probably would have financial implications, and we need a
>   guide as to how large people would like those financial implications to
>   be."
> 
> ..and..
> 
>  "Resource impact:  Moderate. Significant staff training, additional
>   staff, software tools, all could be required."
> 

> The first is a question, we need to know how many resources to put into
> this, but the second suggests there is a known level of impact, and it's
> Moderate.  It could in fact be low, if that's what the community wants,
> but it appears the level under consideration was decided before the
> community discussed the proposal.

Depending on the level of effort the community wants us to invest, the 
resource impact could be quite significant.  The potential staff impact 
was indeed discussed at length during 2011-2's presentation during the
Public Policy Meeting.

> I'll note in the written comments, 5 speak positively, 3 negatively.
> All of the positive ones make some comments that they have issues
> with the language that may prevent them from voting for this specific
> proposal, but they like the idea.
> 
> [For the record, the show of hands was 7 in favor, 45 against.]
> 
> I would have hoped with folks speaking in support but with language
> changes that the AC might have tried to adjust the language and run
> it through another meeting.

Parties interesting in submitting an adjusted proposal should refer
here: <https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_appendix_b.html>

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN