[arin-ppml] Accusation of fundamental conflict of interest/ IP address policy pitched directly to ICANN
dogwallah at gmail.com
Fri Apr 29 16:13:27 EDT 2011
While threads are coming fast and furious this week,
I thought that it might be useful to step back and look at
a policy proposal that fundamentally affects our policy making.
On the http://icann.org/en/correspondence/ page is a proposal
(look for "Policy Proposal on IP Address Registration Services"
on the above url). there are multiple versions.
In addition to the proposed policy, there is a letter of even greater
concern at http://icann.org/en/correspondence/holtzman-to-jeffrey-02mar11-en.pdf
This one says that the numbering community (the ASO) isn't capable of making
objective decisions regarding this proposal, so it ask that "a more open forum",
one overseen by a neutral director or the NTIA.
It seems this is an "end run" around the global PDP, something which I
ARIN community should understand fully at this juncture in deliberations.
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
More information about the ARIN-PPML