[arin-ppml] Microsoft receives court approval for transfer as agreed with ARIN

Ronald F. Guilmette rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Apr 28 20:05:21 EDT 2011


In message <BANLkTikg_BQE0Yv2hJMV9F03v+Q7XawS3A at mail.gmail.com>, 
William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:51 PM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> how do you suggest we go about getting legacy address
>>> registrants who have not already done so to express an opinion?
>>
>> =A0From a legacy holder's perspective, what positive business incentive i=
>s there in subjecting oneself to ARIN policy?
>
>Security. Like putting your money in a bank. But that notion doesn't
>work if the deposit agreement insists that you don't own your
>deposit...

I am in favor of getting all of those legacy holders into the ARIN tent,
but, I can see Herrin's point...

  http://www.rapidtrends.com/safe-deposit-boxes-maybe-not-so-safe/




More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list