[arin-ppml] Microsoft receives court approval for transfer as agreed with ARIN
Ronald F. Guilmette
rfg at tristatelogic.com
Thu Apr 28 20:05:21 EDT 2011
In message <BANLkTikg_BQE0Yv2hJMV9F03v+Q7XawS3A at mail.gmail.com>,
William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:51 PM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> how do you suggest we go about getting legacy address
>>> registrants who have not already done so to express an opinion?
>>
>> =A0From a legacy holder's perspective, what positive business incentive i=
>s there in subjecting oneself to ARIN policy?
>
>Security. Like putting your money in a bank. But that notion doesn't
>work if the deposit agreement insists that you don't own your
>deposit...
I am in favor of getting all of those legacy holders into the ARIN tent,
but, I can see Herrin's point...
http://www.rapidtrends.com/safe-deposit-boxes-maybe-not-so-safe/
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list