[arin-ppml] Microsoft receives court approval for transfer as agreed with ARIN

[Keith W. Hare]

>From my point of view as a legacy holder, the positive business incentive subjecting ourselves to ARIN policy is an orderly internet.

My company gets a much larger benefit out of having the internet work in a resonably orderly fashion than we could ever hope to get out of selling off our IP address assignment.

Keith Hare
JCC Consulting, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 1:54 PM
To: David Conrad
Cc: arin-ppml
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Microsoft receives court approval for transfer as agreed with ARIN

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:51 PM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> how do you suggest we go about getting legacy address registrants who 
>> have not already done so to express an opinion?
>
>  From a legacy holder's perspective, what positive business incentive is there in subjecting oneself to ARIN policy?

Security. Like putting your money in a bank. But that notion doesn't work if the deposit agreement insists that you don't own your deposit...

-Bill


--

William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________
PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.