[arin-ppml] Microsoft receives court approval for transfer as agreed with ARIN

[John Curran]

On Apr 28, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> 
> The fact is that transparency isn't important for the justification
> end of things if you think about it.  As long as 80% of the IPv4
> addresses that Microsoft got from the sale go into use within 12 months
> or whatever their utilization requirement is, then we don't need to
> have transparency there.  We DO need to have someone following up
> and making sure this happens on these very large public consumptions,
> though.

ARIN may review the current usage of any resources maintained 
in the ARIN database, and while I don't know about this being 
a "very large public consumption" relatively speaking, the point 
is noted for followup.

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN