[arin-ppml] ARIN-2011-6: Returned IPv4 Addresses - Last Call

Chris Grundemann cgrundemann at gmail.com
Fri Apr 22 13:31:22 EDT 2011


On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Chris Grundemann
> <cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
>> There are two possible scenarios currently:
>> i. We do not change policy and ARIN staff may return space now.
>> ii. We implement 2011-6 as currently revised and ARIN staff may not
>> return space now but may once a global policy for the re-allocation of
>> space through the IANA has passed all five regions.
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> Actually, there is a third possible scenario. Frank or I or anyone
> else can petition. With 10 statements of support the other version
> will also move to last call.

Very good point, my apologies for not including that - you are
absolutely correct that a petition could move other text forward. I am
not sure exactly which text would be eligible though (the original
text, one of the revisions to the proposal, the original draft text,
the revised draft text presented at the meeting, etc).

> This issue isn't important enough to me to initiate a petition, but I
> would support one if someone else finds it important enough.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> The ASO AC has abandoned work on that proposal, so, I'm not
>> sure whether the sudden ratification by the other registries would
>> have that effect or not. I believe once the policy is abandoned
>> by the ASO AC, it would require a 5-registry approval to revive it.
>
> As I understand it, only the first proposal (where ARIN's version was
> different than the rest) has been formally abandoned. The second
> version (initiated at ARIN) is still pending but the other regions
> aren't seriously considering it. That was as of a month or so ago, so
> maybe something has changed.

The status of the three global proposals for the IANA to reallocate
space are as follows:

GPP-IPv4-2009 (the first one) - Adopted in all five regions, different
text adopted in ARIN, abandoned by the ASO AC (could be resurrected if
all four other regions changed their text to match ARINs or if ARIN
changed our text to match theirs, either of these options would
require a new policy proposal in the affected region(s) I believe)

GPP-IPv4-2010 (the second) - Adopted in ARIN, under discussion in
LACNIC and AfriNIC, withdrawn from RIPE, abandoned in APNIC (there is
VERY little possibility of this ever becoming global policy without
re-submission in all of the other four regions)

GPP-IPv4-2011 (the new one) - Moving forward in APNIC, on docket in
ARIN, to be discussed in the other three regions (this has the highest
likelyhood of becoming a global policy, if we adopt it unchanged here
in ARIN)

HTH,
~Chris


>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
>
> --
> William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
> 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>



-- 
@ChrisGrundemann
weblog.chrisgrundemann.com
www.burningwiththebush.com
www.theIPv6experts.net
www.coisoc.org



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list