[arin-ppml] LRSA requirement for resources being transferred

[Matthew Kaufman]

On 4/19/2011 6:43 PM, John Curran wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>> That is correct.  The 8.3 transfer policy specifically places no burden on the seller.  The seller need not be an RSA or LRSA signatory, and presumably in most cases will not be.
> (belated reply)
>
> Bill -
>
>     Thanks for raising this matter; as originally implemented, we decided to direct
>     all legacy transfers into the LRSA process (for vetting of registration) if the
>     resources were not presently under registration services agreement.  While this
>     makes perfect sense from an implementation workflow, it was brought our attention
>     that it had potential for creating an unnecessary burden under some circumstances
>     and was not a requirement of the policy as adopted.

The policy also says "RSA" and not "the RSA" or "an RSA", adding to the 
confusion. This can be fixed (or not, depending on your POV) with a 
policy proposal.

Matthew Kaufman