[arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - March 2011

[Benson Schliesser]

Hi, Marty.

My comment, for the record:

As John says, he offered to meet with me to discuss the staff and legal review.  I understood (or misunderstood, perhaps) the meeting to be a discussion of the existing staff / legal review as well as a discussion of the next-steps.  Since I was soon traveling to the DC area, we arranged to meet over breakfast.  Unfortunately, as John says, he was unable to attend.  John apologized for missing our meeting, and I accepted his apology.

The only reason that I mentioned this, in my previous message, was to inquire about whether a staff / legal review was part of the AC's consideration.  From the minutes, it seemed to me that I should ask, in case I was not given all of the relevant information.

Cheers,
-Benson



On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:30 PM, Martin Hannigan wrote:

> John,
> 
> It was discussed on the AC call. It was not discussed to that level of
> detail. It was a passing reference that went unquestioned until now.
> Thanks for the additional details.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/10/11, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
>> Marty -
>> 
>>    Benson was traveling in the DC area, and given that he was relatively
>> new to the PDP and had multiple policy proposals that were under discussion,
>> I offered to meet with him to describe the next steps for each.  This was
>> noted on the AC call that you (and several others) participated in from San
>> Francisco.
>> 
>>    Unfortunately, I could not make it (as I had to go downtown on short
>> notice) so no meeting occurred.
>> 
>> /John
>> 
>> On Apr 10, 2011, at 2:29 PM, "Martin Hannigan" <hannigan at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Benson Schliesser <bensons at queuefull.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> [ snip ]
>>> 
>>>> Unfortunately, John did not attend our scheduled meeting,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Can either of you clarify this? Benson, are you saying that the CEO of
>>> ARIN made an appointment with you personally to discuss your policy
>>> proposal?
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> -M<
>>