[arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - October 2010
john.sweeting at twcable.com
Wed Oct 13 15:22:21 EDT 2010
Bill is correct. As we, the AC, understand it the problem with the address space referenced by Geoff will become a "moot point" in the next 2 weeks or so. We really could not find a correct way to identify this space as it is currently identified as "legacy" but not all legacy is part of this space. We decided to table until our next call as we really were at a dead end on how to handle this exception in the draft policy text.
Marty (or anyone),
Do you have a suggestion on how to handle that space in the text of the draft policy?
On 10/13/10 2:45 PM, "Bill Darte" <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> wrote:
This policy was tabled because the AC within the finite meeting
timeframe was unable to find concrete language that described the
addresses...that Geoff Huston and others referenced in the
meeting....which are the addresses residually held by the RIR of record
as the administrator of /8 blocks allocated across RIRs...as I
understand it.... and for which space an agreement between RIRs exists
(apparently) for the future distribution to other RIRs......or something
We struggled on how to craft language which would have described this
space along with the 'special use' addresses reference in section (2).
Also there were other changes in wording suggested at the meeting which
took some time to craft.
The AC awaits some label or description of those addresses which would
be consitently recognized across RIRs before crafting final language for
this Draft Policy.
I believe (speaking for myself only at this point), that the AC was
otherwise disposed to referring this Draft Policy to last call.
Draft Policy 2010-10
> -----Original Message-----
> From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Hannigan, Martin
> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 1:14 PM
> To: ARIN; arin-ppml at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results -
> October 2010
> On 10/13/10 2:09 PM, "ARIN" <info at arin.net> wrote:
> [ clip ]
> > The following draft policy was tabled until the AC's next meeting:
> > 2010-10 (Global Proposal): Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by
> > the IANA Post Exhaustion
> Interesting. 40:5.
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
More information about the ARIN-PPML