[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 119: Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy - revised

[cja@daydream.com]

How do folks feel about how transfers between regions would affect the
routing table?   We would be in essence punching holes in RIR blocks.   This
depends entirely on whether there are ISPs filtering or aggregating on
regional boundaries based on RIR /8 block allocations.

Thanks!
----Cathy


On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:54 AM, ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:

> The proposal originator submitted a revised version of the proposal.
>
> Regards,
>
> Communications and Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
>
>
> ## * ##
>
>
> Policy Proposal 119: Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy
>
> Proposal Originator: Chris Grundemann, Martin Hannigan, Jason Schiller
>
> Proposal Version: 2.0
>
> Date: 27 October 2010
>
> Proposal type: new
>
> Policy term: permanent
>
> Policy statement: Any RIR's resource registrant may transfer IPv4
> addresses to the resource registrant of another RIR as long as the two
> RIRs agree and exercise Internet stewardship and the values expressed in
> RFC2050.
>
> Rationale: Since individual RIRs now allow transfers, it makes sense to
> be able to transfer between regions as well.
>
> Timetable for implementation: upon ratification of all five RIRs
>
> Timetable for de-implementation: upon change to this policy text in any RIR
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/attachments/20101124/0ff03226/attachment.htm>