[arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - May 2010

[Gary T. Giesen]

I too am a little confused, as there was pretty clear consensus at the
members meeting in Toronto.

GG

On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 16:12 -0400, David Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 01:08:59PM -0400, Member Services wrote:
> > After last call the following draft policy remains on the AC's docket,
> > because it did not receive the required number of votes to move to last
> > call (The AC established a standing rule in January that requires an
> > affirmative vote of the majority of the members of the full Advisory
> > Council regarding any final action on draft policies):
> > 
> >   2010-2: /24 End User Minimum Assignment Unit
> 
> I'm a bit confused by this result.  The PDP suggests that the AC may
> take any action it likes at the end of last call, and a vote of support
> seems reasonable, but this action feels like a non-action.  There was
> fairly clear consensus on this proposal at the last public policy
> meeting, and the AC did move it promptly to last call status.
> 
> I will also note that section 4.4 of the PDP states: "Within 30 days
> of the end of last call the Advisory Council determines consensus for
> each draft policy by reviewing last call comments, revisiting its
> decision, and determining readiness for consideration by the Board of
> Trustees."
> 
> Can someone from the AC identify some specific reasons for not moving
> this proposal forward to the Board?  The summary message didn't
> indicate any specific reason besides a lack of votes within the AC.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -David
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.