[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks

William Herrin bill at herrin.us
Fri Mar 26 15:46:21 EDT 2010


On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> No... I'm not saying we need  a reason to get rid of NAT. I'm saying that
> NAT should be allowed to become obsolete with IPv4.

That word "alllowed"... I do not think it means what you think it means.


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list