[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 118: IPv6 Subsequent Allocation

[Benson Schliesser]

On 21 Jun 10, at 7:39 AM, Member Services wrote:

> Modify 6.5.2.1 Subsequent allocation criteria. ADD the following
> sentence: Subsequent allocations will also be considered for
> transitional technologies that cannot be accommodated by, nor were
> accounted for, under the initial allocation.
> 
> Justification for the subsequent subnet size will be based on the plan
> and technology provided. Justification for these allocations will be
> reviewed every 3 years and reclaimed if it is not in use. Requester will
> be exempt from returning all or a portion of the address space if they
> can show justification for need of this allocation for other existing
> IPv6 addressing requirements be it Native V6 or some other V6 network
> technology.


I support this policy.  ARIN should accommodate the need for address resources supporting v6 transition.  It would be inappropriate for ARIN to prescribe or limit the transition technologies used.

Cheers,
-Benson