[arin-ppml] Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by the IANA Post Exhaustion (Version 2)

[Steve Bertrand]

On 2010.06.02 23:05, Chris Grundemann wrote:

> I like Bill's use of "registrant of record where no RIR holds
> authority" as a replacement for "legacy address space." I also just
> realized that the policy doesn't explicitly state that returned space
> goes into the Reclamation Pool. With that in mind, I suggest this
> wording:
> 
> The IANA will accept into the Reclamation Pool all eligible IPv4
> address space that is offered for return. 

If we're going for global change anyways, does my following change to
your sentence make sense? Although it's only four letters, there is no
room for interpretation:

The IANA *must* accept into the Reclamation Pool all eligible IPv4
address space that is offered for return.

Steve