[arin-ppml] Possible amendment to proposal 116

[William Herrin]

On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:47 AM,  <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote:
> We have a glut of IPv6 addresses. If the transition addresses are mismanaged
> and it takes us 5 years of discussion and overthrow of the BoT in order
> to get the addresses back, this is still a drop in the bucket and will
> not affect regular IPv6 allocation activity.
>
> We just have to get out of this darn scarcity mindset, in particular when
> it comes to helping the world get through this awkward transitionary period.

Michael,

116 has to do with allocating from a set-aside block of scarce IPv4
addresses for projects that facilitate the transition to IPv6. It does
not address the allocation or assignment of IPv6 addresses at all.

Regards,
Bill Herrin



-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004