[arin-ppml] Policy Proposal 95: Customer Confidentiality

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Fri Jan 29 02:29:31 EST 2010


Because it is not "your" IP space, it is the public IP space which you have
been delegated stewardship over a portion of for so long as the you remain
in compliance with the policies set by the community for your stewardship
of that space.

Being a public resource, those using anything more than a very small fraction
of it should be publicly known and publicly accountable for their utilization
of that public resource.

Owen

On Jan 28, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Joe Morgan wrote:

> That is really not the point of this proposal. The point is that I
> should not have to give up my entire customer list to my competitors.
> If somebody is having problems with a company doing business under my
> IP space then there is no reason why they cant contact my arin abuse
> poc. I would rather those go to me than to the customer that can just
> ignore it. I already have problems with people sending complaints to
> the wrong places and I never even get contacted with the abuse
> complaint. I don't understand as arin can request the information why
> does it need to be open to the public?
> 
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibrand at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 1/28/2010 2:35 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>> 
>>> Kevin Kargel wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I agree with and support the AC's decision to abandon Policy proposal 95.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> So do I, but I would suggest that anyone opposed DO NOT respond to
>>> this.  All your doing is re-opening the discussion again which is,
>>> of course, exactly what the submitter wants.
>> 
>> I voted to abandon this proposal, but IMO it's still perfectly valid to
>> discuss the issue here on PPML.  Specifically, the question at hand is
>> whether to make this proposal a draft policy and discuss it at the
>> face-to-face public policy meeting in Toronto.  The AC gave our opinion, and
>> now it's up to the community to petition to advance the proposal if enough
>> of you disagree with the AC on the matter.
>> 
>> This is also the first use of the petition process under the new PDP, so I'm
>> hoping to see the process run smoothly, whatever the outcome.
>> 
>> -Scott
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thank You,
> Joe Morgan
> Joe's Datacenter, LLC
> http://joesdatacenter.com
> _______________________________________________
> PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.




More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list