[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ca
Sun Feb 7 18:36:13 EST 2010


>>>>> "George" == George Bonser <gbonser at seven.com> writes:
    >> -----Original Message----- From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
    >> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net]
    George> On
    >> Behalf Of cja Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 9:29 AM Subject:
    >> Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks
    >> 
    >> I think a common pool is a good idea. It allows these
    >> non-connected networks to connect if their needs change and keeps
    >> them from having to get another allocation/assingment if they do
    >> choose to connect at a later date.

    George> I also believe having non-connected networks out of a common
    George> pool is a good idea.  For one thing, it allows two networks
    George> that are not connected to the global Internet to
    George> interconnect without worrying about address space collisions
    George> provided both networks got their addresses from the same
    George> issuer.  I am thinking of it as a "regionally unique"
    George> address space.

George, what matters is that the addresses are unique for this to happen.
It doesn't matter what pool they come out of.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list