[arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks
Michael Richardson
mcr at sandelman.ca
Sun Feb 7 18:36:13 EST 2010
>>>>> "George" == George Bonser <gbonser at seven.com> writes:
>> -----Original Message----- From: arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net
>> [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net]
George> On
>> Behalf Of cja Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 9:29 AM Subject:
>> Re: [arin-ppml] IPv6 Non-connected networks
>>
>> I think a common pool is a good idea. It allows these
>> non-connected networks to connect if their needs change and keeps
>> them from having to get another allocation/assingment if they do
>> choose to connect at a later date.
George> I also believe having non-connected networks out of a common
George> pool is a good idea. For one thing, it allows two networks
George> that are not connected to the global Internet to
George> interconnect without worrying about address space collisions
George> provided both networks got their addresses from the same
George> issuer. I am thinking of it as a "regionally unique"
George> address space.
George, what matters is that the addresses are unique for this to happen.
It doesn't matter what pool they come out of.
--
] He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life! | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr at sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
then sign the petition.
More information about the ARIN-PPML
mailing list