[arin-ppml] *Spam?* Re: Discussion Petition of ARIN-prop-125 Efficient Utilization of IPv4 Requires Dual-Stack
bill at herrin.us
Thu Dec 30 13:47:10 EST 2010
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Chris Grundemann
<cgrundemann at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, prop-125 states that if an org wants any *more/new* IPv4
> addresses, they need to show that they are actively deploying
> production IPv6. The requirement is to use new IPv4 addresses in the
> most efficient way (the policy does not force anyone to request new
> IPv4, only to use it in the communities best interest if they do).
If you're in the United States and you breath air, you're generally
required to pay taxes on your income. Note that the law does not force
anyone to breath fresh air, only to pay income tax if they do.
Come on you air breather, of course the proposal is to force people to
adopt IPv6. Embrace the concept and think about how to approach it
with a lighter hand. What is the least disruptive, least harsh thing
you can do which will still force folks a helpful distance down the
IPv6 adoption path?
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
More information about the ARIN-PPML